

Better Allies: Everyday Actions to Create Inclusive, Engaging Workplaces
Chapter Summaries
What's Here for You
Are you ready to move beyond good intentions and become a powerful force for positive change in your workplace? "Better Allies" isn't just another book about diversity and inclusion; it's your practical, actionable guide to becoming an everyday ally. Author Karen Catlin understands that true allyship isn't a static achievement, but a dynamic, continuous journey of learning, listening, and evolving. This book promises to equip you with the tools and insights to actively dismantle exclusionary practices and foster environments where everyone can thrive. Within these pages, you'll discover how to navigate the nuances of professional networks, transform potentially alienating events into opportunities for connection, and revolutionize your hiring and meeting practices. Catlin unflinchingly examines the subtle yet insidious nature of 'office housework,' the power dynamics embedded in everyday language, and the critical importance of giving constructive, equitable feedback. You'll learn to recognize and interrupt microaggressions, understand the hidden biases in public platforms, and, most importantly, discover how to intentionally open doors for others, amplifying their voices and opportunities. The tone is one of empowering realism. Catlin doesn't shy away from the difficult truths or the complexities of creating inclusive spaces, drawing from her own experiences and the critical feedback of others. Yet, the overarching message is one of hope and agency. You will gain a deeper understanding of the systemic barriers that exist, a newfound awareness of your own blind spots, and a clear roadmap for making a tangible difference. Prepare to shift your perspective, refine your actions, and embrace the profound satisfaction of being a truly effective ally. This is your invitation to not just witness change, but to actively drive it.
The Ally Journey
The author, Karen Catlin, illuminates the profound truth that allyship is not a destination, but a continuous, unfolding journey. Like a seasoned cartographer charting unknown territories, we must remain open to learning, refining our perspectives, and even changing our minds as we encounter the diverse experiences of others. Catlin emphasizes that our individual viewpoints, shaped by unique life paths, can never encompass the full spectrum of human experience. Therefore, the first vital step on this path is a commitment to perpetual learning and growth, recognizing that the pursuit of genuine allyship is a shared endeavor, not a solitary achievement. This journey necessitates a deep dive into the concept of privilege, a set of unearned benefits conferred by societal structures based on group identity—be it race, gender, class, or sexual orientation. Catlin clarifies that privilege isn't about an easy life or a lack of hard work, but rather about the absence of systemic obstacles that others must navigate. She offers a vivid analogy of two cyclists taking different routes: one with a downhill path and a tailwind, the other facing an uphill climb and headwinds, both arriving at the destination, but with vastly different struggles. This distinction is crucial, especially when considering intersectionality, the compounding effect of multiple marginalized identities, as explained by Kittu Pannu and originally coined by Kimberl Crenshaw. Understanding privilege is often challenging because it's invisible to those who possess it, leading to defensiveness. Catlin provides a comprehensive list of fifty potential privileges in the workplace, inviting readers to self-reflect not with guilt, but with awareness, urging them to leverage these advantages empathetically. This awareness then empowers allies to adopt various roles: the Sponsor, who vocally supports colleagues' work; the Champion, who defers in public forums to create space for underrepresented voices; the Amplifier, who ensures marginalized voices are heard and respected in communication; the Advocate, who uses influence to include peers in exclusive circles; the Scholar, who actively seeks to learn about others' challenges without burdening them; and the Upstander, who intervenes against offensive behavior. Finally, the Confidant, who provides a safe space for sharing experiences, highlights the importance of belief and validation. Catlin concludes by reassuring us that perfection is not the goal; rather, it is the willingness to make mistakes, learn, and iterate that defines the truly effective ally. The path is ongoing, filled with opportunities for everyday action, and the invitation is to embrace this dynamic process with courage and compassion.
Knights versus Allies
Karen Catlin, in her chapter 'Knights versus Allies,' grapples with a profound distinction, one that emerged not from academic theory but from the raw, often critical, feedback of her online audience. Initially, her initiative 'Better Allies' aimed to foster inclusive workplaces, but unexpected criticism from women who felt the concept of 'allies' could be patronizing, akin to knights in shining armor rescuing damsels in distress, forced a pivotal reevaluation. This tension between well-intentioned support and the potential for condescension became the crucible for a deeper understanding. Catlin explains that true allyship transcends individual acts of rescue; it’s about systemic change. A knight might offer a single, underrepresented candidate a personal mentorship to overcome biased hiring criteria, a commendable act for that one person. However, an ally, recognizing the flawed system, would challenge the inconsistent evaluation methods, pushing for objective criteria and establishing best practices for all future hiring committees. Similarly, in meetings, while a knight might summarize a point for someone repeatedly interrupted, an ally redirects the conversation back to the original speaker, reinforcing their voice and potentially instituting meeting norms to prevent future interruptions. The author illustrates this with Amanda, who, instead of simply correcting one woman's underpaid salary, initiated a company-wide gender-based salary review, uncovering broader inequities and creating lasting systemic change. This distinction is crucial: knights fix problems for individuals; allies dismantle the systems that create the problems in the first place. Catlin emphasizes that good intentions are insufficient; allies must consider the repercussions of their actions and translate heartfelt desires into meaningful, constructive efforts that avoid patronizing anyone. The core insight is that focusing solely on individual 'saves' perpetuates a dependency, whereas true allyship empowers by transforming the environment itself, ensuring everyone has the opportunity to thrive, not just survive. It’s about shifting from 'saving' to 'systemically enabling.'
Listening and Learning
The journey of allyship, as Karen Catlin explains, is not one of perfection but of perpetual learning, a continuous challenge to remain curious, listen with an open mind, and iterate as new understanding dawns. It is an impossible task to know everything or anticipate every need, but the power lies in our willingness to be open to constant learning and to truly hear the needs and expectations voiced by those around us. Valuable allies, Catlin reveals, are those who ask questions rather than making pronouncements, who are agile enough to reevaluate established practices, and who see themselves as travelers on a lifelong learning path. Broaching sensitive topics like sexism, racism, and discrimination is inherently difficult, fraught with the fear of causing rifts or saying the wrong thing, a fear that can lead to paralysis. Yet, Catlin urges us to remember that true allies take responsibility for learning what is right, pushing past personal anxieties and embracing vulnerability. This vulnerability, demonstrated by Dave in his struggle to lead an ally group without overstepping, is key: instead of guessing what underrepresented groups need, allies should directly ask them how they wish to be supported, a principle that moves beyond harmful assumptions. When opening these dialogues, best practices emerge: ask permission to ask, acknowledge your own fears and imperfections to create a safer space, and most crucially, be open and respectful, trusting the speaker to share their truth without invalidation or defensiveness. The narrative then shifts to address the inevitable discomfort of feedback, particularly regarding privilege; Catlin shares a personal anecdote about reacting defensively to a comment about educational privilege, underscoring the vital need to accept one's own biases and counternarratives, and to focus on actionable improvement rather than excuses. This is where the concept of 'red flag language' becomes critical—phrases that signal underlying prejudice, like 'culture fit' or 'not enough pipeline,' demand attention and action, challenging the often-misguided mandate to 'assume positive intent,' which can inadvertently silence marginalized voices and excuse harmful behavior. The chapter culminates by urging allies to move beyond being passive bystanders to active upstanders, recognizing that discomfort in confronting injustice pales in comparison to the lived experience of those facing discrimination. Whether it's a colleague being harassed, a woman being passed over for a job due to her attractiveness, or an inappropriate team outing, allies must learn to speak up, verbalize observations, appeal to better instincts, and set clear boundaries, understanding that 'that doesn't happen here' is a dangerous denial that prevents growth and perpetuates harm. Ultimately, Catlin’s message is a call to continuous action: listen, believe, learn, and repeat, for true allyship is built not on grand gestures, but on the humble, consistent practice of showing up, speaking up, and learning from every interaction.
Your Network
Karen Catlin, embarking on a new venture as a leadership coach for women in tech, discovered a stark reality: her professional network, built over decades, was surprisingly limited and homogeneous, primarily consisting of individuals much like herself. This realization, born from the daunting task of launching a business without a robust support system, highlights a fundamental human tendency. As Catlin explains, we naturally gravitate towards 'convenience networks,' people who share our interests, hobbies, and backgrounds, creating echo chambers that stifle diverse perspectives and opportunities. This phenomenon is evident across industries and demographics; for instance, reports show that a significant percentage of white individuals lack people of color in their social networks, and women often rely on predominantly female professional circles. The challenge intensifies when considering the complexities of the MeToo era, where some male leaders, fearing misinterpretation, have adopted practices like the 'Billy Graham rule,' consciously avoiding one-on-one interactions with female colleagues. Catlin illustrates the detrimental effect of this, noting how such avoidance can lead to women being overlooked for mentorship and career-advancing opportunities, akin to a boss inviting only men to a baseball game, inadvertently sharing insights and opportunities that women miss. The author argues that true allyship requires actively pushing beyond these comfort zones, not retreating. She posits that even in light of these sensitivities, allies can and should attend identity-specific networking events, provided their intentions are clear—to listen, learn, and support, rather than to simply fill a diversity quota or exploit a safe space. The core dilemma, then, is how to cultivate a network that is not only expansive but also genuinely diverse, thereby unlocking new perspectives and opportunities for everyone. Catlin offers a compelling resolution: proactive, intentional diversification. This involves actively seeking out individuals who differ from us in gender, race, age, and professional background, whether through casual office interactions, industry events, online communities, or formal mentorship programs. The narrative arc moves from the personal tension of Catlin's own network limitations to the broader societal insight about the counterproductive nature of homogeneous networks, culminating in the empowering resolution that diversifying our connections is an actionable path toward more inclusive and effective workplaces.
Organizing and Attending Events
The author, Karen Catlin, illuminates the often-unseen landscape of professional events, revealing how they can inadvertently become arenas for microaggressions and exclusion. She paints a picture of the conference party, a space meant for connection, but which too often devolves into scenarios where individuals from underrepresented groups are mistaken for staff, asked irrelevant questions that undermine their expertise, or subjected to assumptions that diminish their professional standing. These aren't isolated incidents; they are the everyday slights, snubs, and insults that Derald Wing Sue defines as microaggressions – subtle yet persistent messages that communicate hostility and invalidate one's identity or reality. These constant, small cuts, like water dripping on stone, can wear down an individual's sense of belonging and worth, creating a slow erosion of confidence and engagement. Catlin emphasizes that recognizing these microaggressions is the crucial first step for allies. This involves accepting their reality, even if you haven't experienced them firsthand, and creating spaces for open discussion. The chapter then pivots to actionable strategies for organizers and attendees alike, offering a blueprint for crafting truly inclusive professional gatherings. It underscores the importance of diverse planning committees and speaker lineups, urging event leaders to actively seek out and amplify voices from underrepresented groups, much like the OURSA conference, which emerged as a direct response to a homogeneous speaker list. Creating and rigorously enforcing a code of conduct is presented not as a mere formality, but as a vital tool for establishing a safe and respectful environment, ensuring that harassment-free experiences are not just an aspiration but a reality. Accessibility, too, is explored beyond physical ramps, encompassing invisible disabilities and the need for accommodations like sign language translation and closed captions. The narrative also highlights the subtle power of representation, urging the use of diverse imagery in all event-related materials, sending a clear signal that everyone is welcome. Moreover, Catlin challenges attendees to think holistically about the event experience, from the inclusivity of food and beverage options – ensuring non-alcoholic choices are as appealing as alcoholic ones – to the sensitivity of music and presentation content, citing the jarring insensitivity of playing a song like 'Die Young' before an HIV/AIDS panel. The core tension lies in the gap between the intention of professional events to foster connection and the reality of their exclusionary impact. The resolution lies in conscious, deliberate action: allies must move from passive observation to active intervention. Catlin provides a powerful toolkit for speaking up, offering scripted responses to confront microaggressions, offensive jokes, and harassment, framing silence as complicity and action as a duty. She stresses that visible enforcement of codes of conduct is essential, as unspoken rules and secret chastisements fail to set norms or deter future transgressions. Ultimately, the chapter calls for a fundamental shift, transforming professional events from potential minefields of exclusion into vibrant, equitable spaces where every individual feels seen, valued, and empowered to contribute their full expertise.
Hiring Practices
The author, Karen Catlin, begins by dismantling the pervasive excuses that plague hiring pipelines, revealing how the notion of a 'high bar' in tech often masks a poorly designed system that fails to recognize diverse talent. Catlin shares a personal anecdote of interviewing for the same role as her partner, Tim, experiencing firsthand how the bar was lowered for her simply because she was a woman, a stark illustration of unconscious bias. She explains that this isn't an isolated incident; research by Alison Wynn and Shelley Correll highlights how companies can alienate potential candidates from the outset with exclusionary cultures and imagery, while Makinde Adeagbo recounts a deeply offensive interview that underscored the need for cultural shifts. Catlin then pivots to actionable strategies, emphasizing the critical role of a company's careers page in attracting a diverse pool. She urges allies to use inclusive language and imagery, showcase social impact, and highlight benefits like parental leave, making it clear that candidates need to envision themselves succeeding within the organization. Moving to job descriptions, Catlin advocates for paring down requirements to the absolute essentials, citing research by Hewlett-Packard and Tara Mohr that shows women often hesitate to apply if they don't meet 100% of qualifications, unlike men who may apply at 60%. This leads to the insight that requirements should be truly necessary, not reflections of subtle biases or conventional expectations, such as demanding a specific degree or open-source experience, which can inadvertently exclude qualified candidates from underrepresented groups. Catlin further challenges the notion of 'culture fit,' suggesting 'culture add' or 'values fit' as more inclusive alternatives, and proposes structured interviews with objective criteria and work tests as more reliable predictors of success. She illuminates the 'leaky pipeline' by demonstrating that the problem isn't a lack of candidates but often a failure to look in the right places, advocating for diverse job posting sites and employee referral programs specifically targeting underrepresented groups, as Pinterest successfully did. The chapter concludes by stressing the importance of making offers strategically to diversify teams and, crucially, onboarding new hires in a way that validates their skills and combats the feeling of tokenization, ensuring that the 'bar' is understood as a firm, anonymized standard that everyone must meet, thereby truly attracting the best talent.
Meetings in the Workplace
The author, Karen Catlin, illuminates a pervasive, often subtle, yet deeply impactful tension within the modern workplace: the inequity embedded in meeting culture. She reveals how seemingly innocuous dynamics can marginalize voices, drawing from personal anecdotes like the one where her idea was re-proposed and credited to someone else, a moment that sparked a profound realization about the need for allies. Catlin dissects common meeting pitfalls, such as 'manterruptions,' where women are interrupted significantly more often than men, a pattern rooted in socialization and a fear of appearing too talkative, as linguist Deborah Tannen explains. This leads to the 'double bind,' where women are either seen as too aggressive or underestimated. Another insidious issue is 'bropropriation' or idea hijacking, where valuable contributions from marginalized individuals are dismissed only to be later embraced when re-articulated by a dominant voice. To combat this, Catlin introduces the powerful 'amplification' strategy, a technique pioneered by women in the Obama administration, where allies echo and credit the original idea-giver, effectively safeguarding their contributions. The narrative also addresses 'off-topic questions and showboating,' where individuals use questioning to undermine credibility rather than seek understanding, much like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez faced. Furthermore, the often-unseen burden of 'meeting housework'—taking notes, scheduling—disproportionately falls on women, a practice Catlin suggests can be disrupted by rotating responsibilities or, for one-off tasks, assigning them to men to send a clear message. Misdirected questions, where inquiries are aimed at male colleagues despite a woman's superior expertise, are also highlighted, with examples of stakeholders like Andy and Chad Loder who actively redirect these questions to the most qualified person. Even 'economy seating,' where individuals from underrepresented groups gravitate towards the periphery, signals a lack of perceived status. Catlin urges allies to actively invite these individuals to 'power seats' or even offer to swap. The chapter concludes with a call to leverage 'back channels'—peer-to-peer messaging—for real-time allyship, and a stark reminder about choosing appropriate venues for out-of-office meetings, steering clear of places like strip clubs that can alienate colleagues. Ultimately, Catlin crafts a compelling case for active, conscious allyship, transforming meetings from potential battlegrounds of inequity into fertile ground for collaboration and mutual respect, where every voice, not just the loudest, can resonate.
Office Housework
The author, Karen Catlin, invites us to confront a subtle yet pervasive issue in the workplace: 'office housework.' This isn't the core work that drives business, but rather the administrative and often undervalued tasks that keep operations running smoothly – think taking meeting minutes, ordering food, or organizing team celebrations. Catlin illustrates this with a vivid anecdote from 2017, where a male committee member, Bob, refused to take notes, citing a lack of skill, prompting Catlin's sharp retort, 'Practice makes perfect, and this is the perfect place to practice.' This seemingly minor incident highlights a larger trend, supported by research like 'The Elephant in the Valley' report, which found nearly half of surveyed women had been asked to perform lower-level tasks not assigned to their male colleagues. This imbalance is particularly acute for women of color, who face the 'Angry Black woman' stereotype if they refuse such duties. The core dilemma, then, is how these nonpromotable tasks, often assumed to be enjoyed or naturally suited for women, can inadvertently sideline individuals from crucial, career-advancing opportunities. They consume valuable time, interrupt deep work, and can lead to being perceived as less capable or leaderly, even when performing them with enthusiasm, as in the case of Julie, who hated seeing dirty mugs but never actually enjoyed washing them. The impact is a quiet erosion of potential, a slow drift away from visibility and promotion. Catlin argues, with the conviction of someone who has navigated these waters, that allies have a responsibility, even a duty, to disrupt this pattern. The resolution lies in conscious action: allies can advocate for rotation schedules for administrative tasks, supervisors can deliberately assign 'stretch' opportunities to those typically overlooked, and individuals can gently push back by deferring decisions to managers or asking for articulation of why they are the 'right' person for the job. Even small gestures, like clearing one's own coffee mug or pointing out unattended messes, can signal a commitment to equitable distribution. Ultimately, understanding office housework is the first step; actively sharing the load is the path towards a truly inclusive and effective workplace where everyone's contributions are valued and their potential is unleashed.
Everyday Language
The author, Karen Catlin, unveils the profound power of everyday language, illuminating how words, once commonplace, can become outdated, harmful, or simply inappropriate as society evolves. Just as terms like 'Orient' and 'Oriental' have thankfully given way to more respectful appellations like 'Asia' and 'Asians,' our linguistic landscape is a living entity, constantly shifting to reflect new understandings and current events. Catlin shares the jarring example of 'WUBA' – 'Women with Unbelievably Big Asses' – a term that has thankfully faded from use at institutions like the U.S. Naval Academy, demonstrating a collective shift away from demeaning language, often driven by changing demographics and a growing awareness of inclusivity. Yet, resistance to these linguistic shifts often stems from those with the most privilege, who may not grasp the harm caused by their persistent use of outdated terms. This chapter, therefore, serves as a vital guide for allies, urging them to actively identify and abandon problematic language, particularly around gender, identity, and ethnicity, fostering more welcoming workplaces. Catlin emphasizes that unnecessary gendered language, like 'manhours' or 'female lawyer,' can subtly reinforce biases, implying limitations or unusualness where none should exist. She unpacks the pervasive use of 'guys' to address mixed-gender groups, revealing how it can alienate non-binary individuals and women, urging a conscious shift to inclusive terms like 'folks' or 'everyone.' Similarly, the traditional 'ladies and gentlemen' is highlighted as exclusive, with 'distinguished guests' or a simple 'everyone' serving as more welcoming alternatives. The author delves into the subtle sexism embedded in phrases like 'man up' and the patronizing nature of terms like 'lady' when applied to professions, advocating for neutral and respectful language. Crucially, Catlin addresses the evolution of pronouns, championing the singular 'they/them' not just for unknown genders but as a grammatically sound and inclusive choice, even referencing historical literary precedent. She then pivots to the insidious use of disability and mental health terms as negative metaphors – 'nuts,' 'crazy,' 'lame' – demonstrating how these casual linguistic choices can profoundly diminish the lived experiences of those with these conditions. The narrative extends to the appropriation of Indigenous language, cautioning against terms like 'powwow' and encouraging respectful alternatives, underscoring the importance of cultural sensitivity. Even within industries, terms like 'master-slave' and 'whitelist-blacklist' are challenged for their problematic undertones, with practical swaps like 'primary-replica' and 'safelist-blocklist' offered. Finally, Catlin touches upon 'unconscious demotions,' where assumptions about a person's role based on appearance lead to demeaning questions, advocating for open-ended inquiries instead. Ultimately, the message is clear: becoming an ally is a journey of continuous learning and adjustment, where mindful language choice is not a trivial matter but a fundamental building block of an inclusive and respectful environment. It requires a willingness to apologize when we err and a commitment to leading by example, creating spaces where these vital conversations can flourish.
On Stage
The author, Karen Catlin, begins by recounting her own initial trepidation about public speaking when launching her coaching business in 2012. Despite a lack of confidence and enjoyment in speaking, she embraced the advice to increase her visibility, setting a goal to speak monthly. This journey, she reveals, transformed her into a self-proclaimed 'public speaking geek,' even leading to co-authoring a book on the topic. Catlin posits public speaking as a 'career multivitamin,' noting its power to increase visibility, attract sponsors, and foster career growth. Crucially, she highlights its role in creating role models, especially for those from underrepresented groups, who can shatter stereotypes and empower others by simply being seen. Allies, she argues, play a vital role in creating these opportunities. They can intentionally foster visibility by posing the first question in Q&A sessions to someone from an underrepresented group, asking marginalized staff to deliver project updates, introducing potential speakers to conference organizers, attending dry runs to offer feedback, or even passing along keynote opportunities. A powerful example is when allies turn their own opportunities into showcases, like Megan Smith, who invited female colleagues to join her on stage. The chapter then delves into the pervasive issue of 'homogeneous speaker lineups' – 'manels' and 'manferences' – and the problematic nature of panels lacking lived experience relevant to the topic. Catlin shares her experience at Adobe, where she challenged organizers who boasted of diversity solely based on global office representation, prompting them to actively seek out female track chairs. This illustrates the need for allies to move beyond their comfort zones. Richard Bradshaw's impactful decision to cancel his speaking engagement at Code Europe upon discovering an all-male lineup, and subsequently creating a 'speaker rider' requiring diverse speakers, serves as a potent call to action. Catlin encourages allies to vet events for diversity and codes of conduct, and to refuse participation in exclusionary lineups. She emphasizes that allies can lead by example, and their actions can create a domino effect, inspiring others to withdraw from or push back against non-inclusive events. The narrative extends this principle to event organizers, who are urged to invite male speakers to recommend diverse colleagues, and to actively diversify their own networks. Even when allies cannot pass on opportunities, they can still embody allyship by ensuring their presentations are inclusive and accessible, taking the microphone when offered for assistive listening devices, avoiding tiny fonts, and using diverse and welcoming visuals. The chapter underscores that using stock photos of people from underrepresented groups, in presentations, marketing collateral, and websites, sends a vital, albeit subtle, message, reinforcing that powerful, talented individuals come from all backgrounds. Ultimately, the chapter resolves with the profound understanding that speaking platforms are often reserved for the privileged, and allies must consciously use their influence to ensure more voices are heard, thereby enabling equity and challenging the notion that only certain people are worthy of the spotlight.
Giving Feedback
The author, Karen Catlin, illuminates a pervasive, often unconscious bias in how feedback is delivered in the workplace, revealing how it can subtly sideline underrepresented groups, particularly women. Research from Stanford University's Clayman Institute, for instance, starkly contrasts the feedback received by men and women, finding that women are less likely to get specific, outcome-tied feedback, whether positive or constructive. Instead, their praise often centers on team contributions or subjective traits like being 'supportive' or 'collaborative,' while men receive language that emphasizes 'drive,' 'transform,' and 'innovate'—descriptors that align more closely with valued leadership qualities. This disparity, echoed by Kieran Snyder's linguistic analysis of performance reviews, shows that critical feedback for women often focuses on emotions and personality, whereas men receive more concrete, actionable suggestions. This pattern creates a significant disadvantage, as vague feedback makes it difficult to build a case for promotion or to understand how to improve. The chapter then broadens this lens, explaining how race and identity also intersect with feedback disparities, citing studies that show Black workers face extra scrutiny and LGBTQ+ individuals experience discrimination affecting pay and promotions. Catlin underscores that this isn't merely about individual bias but systemic issues embedded in performance appraisals, creating a feedback loop that widens racial and gender gaps. The narrative then shifts to the 'look of a leader' bias, where supervisors, often unconsciously, associate communal traits with women and agentic traits with men, leading women to be penalized regardless of their leadership style. This is further compounded by 'gatekeeping'—where feedback, though perhaps well-intentioned, can subtly discourage individuals from pursuing ambitious paths, as seen in the example of a professor discouraging a student from a PhD. Catlin proposes a powerful antidote: 'flip it to test it,' urging us to ask if we would give the same feedback to someone of a different background. The chapter also confronts the stark reality of pay inequity, highlighting that even with equal performance scores, women and people of color often receive less compensation, a gap that can widen significantly over a career, as demonstrated by the poignant example of two software engineers. This issue demands proactive intervention, with companies like Salesforce taking significant steps to close pay gaps. Ultimately, Catlin argues that becoming a better ally means providing effective and equitable feedback. This involves focusing on business impact, using objective criteria, ensuring reviews are of similar length and detail for all employees, and, crucially, asking for feedback on one's own allyship. The core tension, therefore, is the struggle against unconscious bias in communication that limits potential, and the resolution lies in conscious, specific, and equitable feedback practices that empower everyone to thrive.
Opening Career Doors
Karen Catlin, in her chapter 'Opening Career Doors,' illuminates the profound impact of allies in navigating and advancing professional journeys, weaving personal anecdotes with broader workplace dynamics. The narrative unfolds with Catlin's own experiences, starting with a manager, Norm Meyrowitz, who, despite her resignation, actively recommended her for a position in England, a gesture that opened a literal and figurative door. This sets the stage for a central theme: allies don't just offer support; they actively create opportunities. Catlin then recounts a pivotal moment in her career at Macromedia when her vice president, Joe Dunn, enthusiastically embraced her announcement of pregnancy and request for maternity leave and part-time work, offering a promotion to director level, demonstrating that support for personal life can coexist with professional advancement. The concept of sponsorship is further explored through a significant career shift during Adobe's acquisition of Macromedia, where an unknown but influential ally used their 'political clout' to advocate for her, leading to a much larger role. This highlights a critical insight: sponsorship often operates behind the scenes, a powerful force that can dramatically alter career trajectories. The chapter then delves into the crucial role of allies in avoiding assumptions about career goals, contrasting Geoffrey Frost's proactive approach with Dr. Oksana Malysheva, who, despite being a new mother, was offered a challenging leadership role, with instances where managers misaligned opportunities with an individual's aspirations, such as assigning a project management role to someone aiming for software quality management or nudging a leader toward a demotion. This underscores the necessity for allies to truly listen and understand an individual's aspirations rather than imposing their own solutions. The discussion pivots to the concept of 'glamour work' versus 'office housework,' a distinction drawn from research by Joan C. Williams and Marina Multhaup, explaining how high-profile, career-advancing assignments are disproportionately given to men, while women and people of color often receive less visible, less impactful tasks. Allies, Catlin argues, must intentionally distribute these 'glamour' assignments to foster diversity and retain talent. Mentorship emerges as another vital ally action, where seasoned professionals can share 'the gouge'—essential tips for navigating careers—particularly benefiting individuals from underrepresented groups who may otherwise feel 'left out of the know.' This is crucial for fostering equitable career development, especially in fields like tech where representation gaps persist. Catlin also emphasizes the power of 'wholehearted recommendations,' cautioning against the subtle but damaging effect of doubt-raising phrases often found in recommendations for women, contrasting this with the 'prove it again' bias where women and other marginalized groups must consistently demonstrate performance to be considered for promotion, while men are often promoted based on potential alone. Allies can combat this by recognizing and nurturing raw talent based on ability, social skills, and drive, rather than relying on gut feelings or established patterns. A 'simple nudge,' as seen in Google's success with encouraging women to self-nominate for promotions, can also be a powerful ally action, demonstrating that even indirect encouragement can yield significant results. Finally, Catlin addresses intersectionality, acknowledging that the challenges faced by women of color are compounded by additional biases and harassment, requiring tailored allyship. The chapter concludes with a call to action: allies must be 'door openers,' not 'gatekeepers,' actively sponsoring and speaking up for those who may not have the same visibility or access, and crucially, sponsoring individuals who are different from themselves to broaden their own networks and perspectives.
A Call to Action
The author, Karen Catlin, opens this chapter by recounting a series of deeply troubling incidents that punctuate the 'unofficial lousy tech diversity timeline,' a stark reminder of the pervasive sexism, bias, and harassment that plague the industry and beyond. From James Damore's controversial memo at Google, which attempted to attribute pay gaps to biological differences, to Alessandro Strumia's assertion that physics discriminates against men, and Stuart Reges's claim about inherent gendered aptitudes in math and science, these events reveal a persistent undercurrent of doubt regarding diversity efforts. Catlin powerfully illustrates how these incidents don't just make headlines; they create a palpable tension for those directly impacted, forcing them to question their place and merit upon returning to work, wondering if their colleagues harbor similar, unexpressed biases. This tension is further amplified by broader societal issues, as seen in the disparate treatment of Serena Williams and the echoes of Anita Hill's testimony in Dr. Christine Blasey Ford's brave, yet fraught, public statements, highlighting a recurring pattern where those who speak out face victim-blaming and character assassination. This creates a disheartening 'two steps forward, three steps back' momentum in the struggle for equity. Yet, Catlin insists this is not a moment for despair, but for a powerful call to action, urging allies to move beyond passive agreement and actively engage. She proposes that true allyship demands a commitment to 'speak up and speak out,' not just by affirming belief in diversity, but by demonstrating it through concrete actions: vocalizing support for colleagues, expressing genuine gratitude for specific contributions, sharing what has been learned from underrepresented individuals, and, crucially, challenging biased behavior directly rather than remaining a bystander. This isn't about being a singular hero, but about advocating for systemic changes that uplift all marginalized individuals and foster a truly inclusive culture. Furthermore, Catlin introduces the concept of 'sponsorship,' challenging leaders to identify and actively champion four individuals from underrepresented groups, advocating for their development by speaking their names in their absence, sharing their career aspirations with influencers, recommending them for challenging assignments, and publicly endorsing their talents. This act of visibility and vocal support, even more than mentorship, can dramatically alter a person's career trajectory. Finally, the author emphasizes the importance of defining and refreshing personal values, recognizing that allyship must extend beyond workplace protocols and into the realm of business decisions, ensuring that lucrative opportunities do not compromise ethical commitments. True allyship, Catlin concludes, is a continuous journey, a commitment to living one's values and actively contributing to a more equitable future, one action at a time.
Conclusion
Karen Catlin's "Better Allies" offers a compelling and actionable framework for cultivating inclusive, engaging workplaces, emphasizing that allyship is not a static achievement but a dynamic, ongoing journey. The core takeaway is that true allyship demands continuous learning, self-reflection, and consistent, intentional action. Catlin dismantles the allure of 'knight' interventions, advocating instead for 'ally' actions that address systemic inequities. This involves a profound shift in mindset, from seeking personal perfection to embracing iterative improvement and learning from inevitable missteps. A crucial emotional lesson is the importance of vulnerability and resisting defensiveness when receiving feedback, recognizing that discomfort is a signpost for growth. This open-hearted approach is essential for building trust and fostering authentic dialogue about privilege and bias. Practically, the book provides a rich toolkit. Understanding privilege, not as a personal failing but as a systemic advantage, is the foundation for leveraging it. Intersectionality is highlighted as crucial for nuanced understanding, acknowledging that individuals hold multiple identities that shape their experiences. Catlin offers concrete roles allies can adopt—Sponsor, Champion, Amplifier, Advocate, Scholar, Upstander, Confidant—each with specific actions. The wisdom extends to practical applications like diversifying professional networks, actively challenging homogenous event lineups and hiring practices, and transforming meeting dynamics to ensure equitable participation. The book stresses the impact of language, urging a conscious shift towards inclusive terminology and challenging harmful jargon. Furthermore, it empowers allies to disrupt inequitable distributions of 'office housework,' provide actionable feedback, and actively sponsor career advancement. Ultimately, "Better Allies" is a call to move beyond passive good intentions to active, systemic change, recognizing that authentic allyship is driven by a commitment to long-term equity and a desire to create environments where everyone can thrive.
Key Takeaways
Allyship is an ongoing journey of learning and adaptation, requiring a mindset open to continuous improvement rather than striving for a fixed, perfect state.
Understanding privilege involves recognizing unearned societal advantages, not as personal failings, but as systemic benefits that can be leveraged to support others.
Intersectionality highlights how overlapping marginalized identities amplify disadvantages, making a nuanced understanding of individual experiences essential for effective allyship.
Active allyship can manifest in distinct roles—Sponsor, Champion, Amplifier, Advocate, Scholar, Upstander, Confidant—each offering concrete ways to use privilege for empowerment.
The goal of allyship is not perfection, but consistent effort, learning from mistakes, and taking action, even when uncomfortable.
Self-reflection on one's own privileges, using frameworks like the fifty potential privileges, is a critical, non-judgmental step toward becoming a more effective ally.
Distinguish between 'knight' actions, which offer individual rescue but maintain systemic issues, and 'ally' actions, which address root causes for lasting, equitable change.
Recognize that well-intentioned support can be perceived as patronizing if it positions underrepresented individuals as incapable of speaking for themselves or needing constant rescue.
True allyship requires actively working to transform workplace cultures and norms, rather than simply intervening in isolated incidents of inequity.
The measure of effective allyship lies in its potential for systemic impact, benefiting many by addressing ingrained behaviors and creating fairer processes.
Prioritize actions that foster long-term equality and equity by removing barriers, rather than providing temporary fixes for individuals.
Authentic allyship is driven by a commitment to supporting marginalized people long-term, not by the desire to appear helpful or feel good in the moment.
Allyship is a journey of continuous learning and iteration, not a destination of perfection, requiring a commitment to curiosity and open-mindedness.
Directly asking individuals from underrepresented groups how they wish to be supported is more effective and ethical than making assumptions based on privilege.
Vulnerability and the honest acknowledgment of personal fears and biases are essential for creating safe spaces for dialogue about discrimination and inequity.
Resisting defensiveness when receiving feedback, especially concerning privilege, is crucial for personal growth and for fostering trust with marginalized colleagues.
Recognizing and challenging 'red flag language' and the harmful effects of 'assuming positive intent' are vital steps in dismantling systemic biases.
Transitioning from a passive bystander to an active upstander, even when uncomfortable, is a non-negotiable responsibility for effective allyship.
Accepting that prejudice exists within one's own workplace and taking proactive steps to address it is fundamental to creating truly inclusive environments.
Homogeneous professional networks, formed by natural human tendencies towards convenience and similarity, create echo chambers that limit perspectives and opportunities, hindering true inclusivity.
The MeToo movement, while crucial, has inadvertently led some male leaders to avoid interactions with female colleagues, risking the exclusion of women from informal networking and mentorship that fuels career advancement.
Active allyship involves intentionally diversifying one's network by seeking out and engaging with individuals from different backgrounds, even when it feels uncomfortable or requires navigating sensitive social dynamics.
Attending identity-specific networking events as an ally can be beneficial for both the individual and the group, provided the intention is to listen, learn, and support, and the space is not designated as a strictly safe haven.
Diversifying one's network is not merely an act of social justice but a strategic imperative that strengthens professional connections and broadens access to talent and opportunities.
Proactive, intentional actions such as introducing oneself to strangers at events, attending diverse industry gatherings, and engaging with online communities are essential for breaking down network homogeneity.
Microaggressions are insidious, everyday slights that, while often unintentional, cumulatively diminish the sense of belonging for individuals from underrepresented groups.
Organizing inclusive events requires deliberate action, starting with diverse planning committees and speaker lineups that reflect the community being served.
A robust and visibly enforced code of conduct is essential for establishing clear expectations and ensuring accountability for creating safe, harassment-free professional gatherings.
True event accessibility extends beyond physical accommodations to include diverse representation in media, thoughtful catering, inclusive beverage options, and sensitive programming.
Silence in the face of microaggressions or inappropriate behavior at professional events constitutes complicity, making active intervention by allies a moral imperative.
Speaking up against microaggressions and harassment, even when uncomfortable, is crucial for shifting cultural norms and fostering more equitable environments.
The 'high bar' excuse in hiring often masks poorly designed processes that fail to evaluate diverse candidates effectively; true equity requires a re-evaluation of assessment methods.
Company careers pages and job descriptions must actively convey inclusivity through diverse imagery, welcoming language, and a focus on social impact and equitable benefits to attract marginalized candidates.
Reducing job requirements to essential criteria, rather than a lengthy wish list, is crucial, as it encourages women and others who may hesitate to apply if they don't meet every single qualification.
Shifting from 'culture fit' to 'culture add' or 'values fit' allows for the inclusion of diverse perspectives and experiences, enriching a team rather than homogenizing it.
Diversifying candidate pools requires intentionality, including posting on a wider array of job sites and implementing targeted referral programs for underrepresented groups.
Structured interviews with objective criteria and work tests are more reliable predictors of job performance than subjective 'culture fit' assessments, mitigating unconscious bias.
Meeting culture often exhibits ingrained biases that marginalize voices, necessitating active intervention from allies to ensure equitable participation.
The phenomenon of 'manterruptions' and idea hijacking, where contributions from women and marginalized groups are dismissed or co-opted, can be actively countered through strategies like amplification, which credits the original speaker.
Administrative tasks within meetings, often termed 'meeting housework,' disproportionately fall to women and can be addressed by rotating responsibilities or assigning them to men to disrupt the status quo.
Misdirected questions and the tendency for marginalized individuals to occupy less prominent seating arrangements are subtle indicators of power imbalances that allies can rectify by redirecting questions and offering 'power seats'.
Proactive allyship extends to choosing inclusive meeting venues and leveraging peer feedback through 'back channels' to continuously improve meeting dynamics and ensure all feel valued.
Office housework, comprising essential but nonpromotable administrative tasks, disproportionately falls on women and marginalized groups, hindering their career progression.
The perception that women naturally enjoy or are suited for office housework is a harmful stereotype that, when challenged, reveals unconscious bias.
Performing office housework, even when done willingly, can lead to being undervalued, perceived as less leaderly, and can detract time from high-impact, career-advancing work.
Allies play a critical role in disrupting the inequitable distribution of office housework by actively advocating for shared responsibility and challenging biased assumptions.
Challenging requests for office housework, through tactics like deferring to a manager or questioning suitability, can expose biases and encourage more equitable task distribution.
Language is a dynamic force that reflects and shapes societal values, requiring continuous adaptation to ensure inclusivity and respect, moving beyond terms that may have once been acceptable but are now recognized as harmful or exclusionary.
Unnecessarily gendered language, even when used casually, subtly reinforces societal biases and can alienate individuals, necessitating a conscious shift towards neutral terminology in professional and personal contexts.
The casual use of disability or mental health-related terms as negative metaphors can significantly diminish the lived experiences of those with these conditions, highlighting the need to choose language that is both precise and empathetic.
Cultural appropriation extends to language, and terms that reference specific cultural practices or events, even if seemingly innocuous, should be avoided in favor of respectful and contextually appropriate alternatives.
Challenging industry-specific jargon with problematic origins, such as 'master-slave,' is an essential act of allyship, prioritizing ethical considerations over ingrained慣習 (habit) and paving the way for more inclusive terminology.
Being an ally involves not only avoiding harmful language but also creating safe environments for others to discuss linguistic concerns and being open to apologizing and learning when one missteps.
Public speaking is a powerful catalyst for career advancement and personal growth, acting as a 'career multivitamin' that increases visibility and opens doors to opportunities.
Allies can actively create pathways for underrepresented individuals to gain public speaking experience by intentionally offering support, making introductions, and even passing on opportunities.
The prevalence of homogeneous speaker lineups ('manels,' 'manferences') is a systemic issue rooted in a lack of diversity in personal networks, which allies must actively challenge by pushing for change and refusing to participate in exclusionary events.
Challenging exclusionary speaking opportunities, such as Richard Bradshaw's refusal to speak at an all-male conference, can create a ripple effect, inspiring other allies to demand inclusivity and shift event standards.
Allyship in public speaking extends beyond creating opportunities to ensuring inclusivity and accessibility in presentations, including mindful slide design and thoughtful use of visuals that reflect diverse representation.
By consciously sharing speaking platforms and ensuring diverse representation in visual materials, allies can dismantle stereotypes and affirm the worthiness and capability of individuals from all backgrounds.
Vague and subjective feedback, particularly for women and other underrepresented groups, actively hinders career advancement and promotion opportunities by failing to connect actions to business outcomes.
Unconscious biases manifest in performance reviews through language and focus, often associating communal traits with women and agentic traits with men, creating a 'look of a leader' penalty.
Feedback disparities are compounded by race and identity, with marginalized groups facing increased scrutiny and less actionable advice, perpetuating systemic inequalities in pay and opportunity.
The 'gatekeeping' of feedback, even when unintentional, can subtly discourage individuals from pursuing ambitious career paths, underscoring the need for allies to actively support rather than limit potential.
Proactive pay equity reviews and the use of objective criteria in salary and responsibility evaluations are essential to address systemic compensation gaps that disproportionately affect women and people of color.
Becoming an effective ally requires delivering specific, outcome-focused, and equitable feedback, using consistent evaluation criteria, and actively seeking feedback on one's own allyship to foster inclusivity.
Allies actively create career opportunities through advocacy and sponsorship, rather than passively offering support.
Understanding and aligning career opportunities with an individual's specific goals is paramount, avoiding assumptions that can lead to misaligned paths.
Equitable distribution of 'glamour work' is essential for career advancement and retention of underrepresented groups, countering the tendency to assign less impactful tasks.
Mentorship, especially for individuals from underrepresented groups, provides critical 'inside scoop' knowledge and navigates systemic barriers.
Wholehearted, unambiguous recommendations are crucial, as subtle doubt-raising phrases can hinder career progression, particularly for women.
Promoting based on demonstrated potential (ability, social skills, drive) rather than solely on past performance, and actively combating 'prove it again' bias, is a key ally function.
Intentional sponsorship of individuals different from oneself expands networks and opens doors for a broader range of talent.
Pervasive incidents of bias and sexism in professional environments create a tangible emotional toll and a sense of instability for impacted individuals, highlighting the urgent need for active allyship.
True allyship requires moving beyond passive belief to active demonstration through speaking up, speaking out, and challenging inequitable behavior, thereby shifting from bystander to upstander.
Sponsorship, defined as actively advocating for and promoting the career development of individuals from underrepresented groups, is a powerful, actionable strategy for driving systemic change and increasing visibility.
Personal values must be clearly defined and consistently applied, particularly in business contexts, ensuring that allyship is not abandoned when faced with lucrative opportunities that conflict with ethical principles.
The struggle for equity is a continuous journey, demanding ongoing commitment and action rather than a one-time fix, with small, consistent efforts accumulating to create significant cultural shifts.
Action Plan
Review the list of fifty potential privileges and identify at least one area where you can actively be a better ally.
Choose one ally archetype (Sponsor, Champion, Amplifier, Advocate, Scholar, Upstander, Confidant) and intentionally practice that role in your workplace.
When encountering an idea from an underrepresented colleague, amplify it by repeating it and giving them credit.
Actively seek out and consume content (publications, podcasts) created by and about underrepresented groups in your industry.
If you witness behavior or speech that is degrading or offensive, speak up to address it, even if others do not.
When a colleague shares an experience you haven't had, listen without judgment and ask clarifying questions.
Consciously consider who is missing from important meetings or opportunities and advocate for their inclusion.
When considering an intervention, ask: 'How will this action change ingrained behaviors within my company?'
Instead of solving a problem for one person, identify systemic changes that would benefit many employees.
When someone is interrupted in a meeting, redirect the conversation back to their point rather than summarizing it yourself.
Challenge inconsistent evaluation methods in hiring or performance reviews by advocating for objective, standardized criteria.
Initiate or support broader reviews (e.g., salary audits by gender) to uncover and address systemic inequities, not just individual cases.
When recommending someone for opportunities, also work to change the culture so others do the same and provide constructive feedback for their growth.
Reflect on your motivations: Are you seeking to feel good, or genuinely support marginalized individuals long-term?
Commit to asking questions rather than making statements for an entire day to practice active listening.
When considering initiatives to support underrepresented groups, proactively ask those groups directly about their most pressing needs and desired support.
When initiating conversations about difficult topics, openly acknowledge your own fears or concerns about saying the wrong thing to foster trust.
When receiving feedback, especially related to privilege or bias, pause, resist defensiveness, and focus on understanding the speaker's perspective.
Review the 'red flag language' list and actively listen for these phrases in conversations, preparing to gently challenge or inquire further.
Practice moving from bystander to upstander by identifying one situation where you can speak up against inappropriate behavior or bias, even with a simple, non-accusatory question.
If you are in a position of privilege, resist the default response of 'That doesn't happen here' when issues of bias are raised, and instead commit to investigating and improving.
Seek out colleagues from underrepresented groups with whom you have a trusting relationship and ask if they would be comfortable discussing workplace inequities and how you can be a better ally.
Conduct a personal network inventory to identify areas of homogeneity and potential for diversification.
Intentionally introduce yourself to one person who is visibly different from you at every company event, networking opportunity, or industry party.
Seek out and attend industry events or online communities specifically organized for groups with which you are not a member, ensuring your intent is to listen and learn.
If considering attending an event for an underrepresented group, ask the organizer beforehand if allies are welcome and clarify your intentions.
When interacting with colleagues, be mindful of the 'Billy Graham' or 'Mike Pence' rule's impact and proactively communicate your professional intentions if you sense potential for misinterpretation.
Offer to mentor someone from a marginalized group to foster mutual learning and growth.
Actively seek out and consume media (podcasts, blogs) created by or featuring individuals from diverse backgrounds.
When making referrals for jobs or opportunities, consciously consider individuals outside your immediate, homogeneous network.
When organizing an event, ensure the planning committee includes diverse representation from underrepresented groups.
Actively seek out and invite speakers from a variety of backgrounds to ensure diverse voices are featured.
Before registering for or agreeing to speak at an event, inquire about the existence and enforcement of a code of conduct.
If you witness a microaggression or inappropriate behavior, use a prepared script to calmly call it out, such as 'What makes you say/think that?' or 'I don't get it, can you explain the joke?'
When attending events, offer support to individuals who appear uncomfortable or are being targeted by asking, 'Everything okay here?'
As an ally, if you see a homogeneous speaker lineup, contact the organizers to express concern and suggest diverse alternatives.
Ensure that non-alcoholic beverage options at events are as varied and appealing as alcoholic ones.
Review event materials, including slides and swag, for any risqué, insensitive, or offensive content and speak up if found.
Review your company's careers page to ensure it uses inclusive language and imagery, and showcases social impact and equitable benefits.
Pare down job descriptions to include only essential requirements, aiming for a maximum of five core qualifications.
Challenge your internal bias by asking if a candidate would be a 'culture add' rather than solely focusing on 'culture fit.'
Implement structured interviews with standardized questions and evaluation scales for all candidates.
Diversify where job openings are posted, utilizing a range of platforms beyond mainstream professional networks.
Encourage current employees to refer candidates from underrepresented groups by offering targeted referral bonuses or running specific sourcing challenges.
When making an offer between equally qualified candidates, prioritize the candidate who will most diversify your team's perspectives.
When you witness someone being interrupted, interject and state that you'd like to hear them finish, or that you'd like to hear other points of view.
If an idea is re-stated by someone else, amplify the original contributor by saying, 'Great idea. Thanks to [Original Speaker] for surfacing it earlier.'
Actively rotate meeting responsibilities like note-taking and timekeeping among all team members.
When a question is directed to the wrong person, kindly redirect it by saying, '[Correct Person] is the expert on that topic. Let's hear from them.'
Invite individuals from underrepresented groups to take more central seats in meeting rooms, or offer to swap seats with them.
Enlist a trusted peer as a 'back channel buddy' to provide real-time feedback on your allyship in meetings via text or direct message.
When forming new committees or working groups, proactively suggest establishing rotation schedules for administrative tasks like note-taking and scheduling.
If you are a supervisor, actively identify opportunities to assign 'stretch' or developmental tasks to individuals who typically don't receive them, rather than defaulting to the usual person.
When asked to perform office housework, consider responding with phrases like 'I'll have to ask my manager about prioritizing it' or 'Why do you think I'm the right person to handle that?' to prompt reflection on the request.
Model equitable behavior by taking initiative to clean up common areas after meetings, such as disposing of trash or clearing mugs, rather than assuming someone else will.
If you have the influence, facilitate discussions or brainstorming sessions about office housework within your team or company to raise awareness and identify solutions.
Gently encourage colleagues who consistently volunteer for office housework to seek out more impactful tasks, offering concrete examples of such opportunities.
Consciously review your daily vocabulary for unnecessarily gendered terms and replace them with neutral alternatives (e.g., 'folks,' 'everyone,' 'people').
When referring to groups, actively choose inclusive language that acknowledges all genders, moving away from terms like 'guys' or 'ladies and gentlemen.'
Educate yourself on and avoid using terms that appropriate Indigenous cultures or demean individuals with disabilities or mental health conditions.
When unsure of someone's pronouns, use singular 'they/them' or introduce yourself with your own pronouns and ask for theirs.
Challenge industry jargon that has problematic origins or undertones, advocating for and adopting more ethical and inclusive terminology.
If you realize you've used an inappropriate term, offer a sincere apology and commit to learning from the mistake.
Create or participate in a dedicated space, like a Slack channel, for discussing language concerns and suggesting inclusive alternatives within your workplace.
Actively seek opportunities to elevate voices from underrepresented groups by posing the first question in Q&A sessions or assigning them project update roles.
Introduce colleagues from marginalized backgrounds to conference organizers and offer to pass along speaking opportunities if you are invited to speak.
When invited to speak, inquire about the diversity of the existing lineup and push back or decline if the event is homogenous, similar to Richard Bradshaw's 'speaker rider' approach.
If you are an established speaker, actively recommend individuals from underrepresented groups to event organizers for future speaking slots.
When organizing events, explicitly ask male invitees to recommend women or individuals from other underrepresented groups to also speak.
Ensure your presentations and visual materials (slides, marketing collateral) intentionally showcase diverse individuals from various backgrounds, genders, and abilities.
When participating in Q&A, always accept and use a microphone to ensure accessibility for all attendees, including those using assistive listening devices.
When giving feedback, focus on the specific business impact of an employee's work, detailing what they should continue doing and how they can improve to have an even greater impact.
Use objective and consistent criteria to evaluate employees in similar roles, ensuring fairness and reducing bias.
Ensure performance reviews are of similar length and detail for all employees, providing equitable depth of feedback.
Actively solicit feedback on your own allyship by asking team members what you could do differently to better support them or create a more inclusive workplace.
When assessing performance or recommending for promotion, explicitly connect an individual's contributions to broader business goals and strategic objectives.
Practice the 'flip it to test it' method by asking yourself if you would provide the same feedback to someone with a different identity or background.
Advocate for and participate in company-wide pay equity reviews to identify and address any compensation disparities based on gender, race, or other protected characteristics.
Actively inquire about the career goals of direct reports and mentees, and with permission, share these with relevant influencers.
Ensure stretch assignments and learning opportunities are distributed equitably, considering individuals from underrepresented groups.
Provide recommendations and referrals with genuine enthusiasm and without reservation, highlighting strengths unequivocally.
Advocate proactively for colleagues during performance calibration and promotion discussions, ensuring their potential is recognized.
Consciously identify and sponsor individuals who are different from you, speaking their names and endorsing them publicly when opportunities arise.
When evaluating candidates for promotion, focus on ability, social skills, and drive, actively challenging 'prove it again' bias and gut feelings.
Offer mentorship, particularly to those from underrepresented groups, sharing insights and 'the gouge' to help them navigate career paths.
Nudge colleagues from marginalized groups to pursue opportunities they might hesitate to consider, providing encouragement and support.
Publicly affirm your belief in workplace diversity and express appreciation for colleagues' specific contributions.
Challenge biased behavior directly when you witness it, rather than remaining silent.
Identify four individuals from underrepresented groups to actively sponsor by advocating for their career growth and visibility.
Share specific things you have learned from colleagues, highlighting their expertise.
Reflect on your personal values and determine non-negotiable ethical boundaries for business decisions and partnerships.
Commit to ongoing learning and action by subscribing to resources and following thought leaders in allyship.